28 December 2009

Science vs. Divinity


I'm listening to the radio and some "neuro-science guy" is attempting to prove that there is no "essence" behind physical phenomena. Well-spoken, (very) fast-talker, big-words, pompous, etc. Shoots down all callers, dismisses Divinity. He's able to nimbly sidestep answering the question of what is behind physical phenomena. I refuse to call in because an argument would not be useful.

He just admitted that he's an atheist. That explains a lot.

My definition of atheism? A soul that is having too much fun pretending to be separate from The Divine.

How can one believe that there is no Divine Creator? If we are all accidents of Darwinian "evolution", then can someone please tell me how long will it take for the mold in my refrigerator to win a Nobel Prize?

An atheist is a fool, blindfolded in dark room, with a loaded gun.

Some scientists are atheists.

Ergo, some scientists are fools.

Query: should one blindly follow fools?


Let the dead bury their dead. Don't fall for the "okey-doke", friends. The ones with the biggest titles, degrees, honors, etc. are the very ones whose singular purpose is to lead us away from True Overstanding.

~~ G

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

quite interesting post. I would love to follow you on twitter. By the way, did you guys learn that some chinese hacker had busted twitter yesterday again.